#空投活动与分配 Seeing that Brevis's airdrop registration is now open again, it's the familiar process—qualification review, limited-time claim, share announcement. Over the years, I've seen too many projects use airdrops to generate buzz, but few actually succeed in landing.

The 32.2% community incentive share is a number I remember well. Going back to 2017, many projects had similar setups; the incentive ratio looked attractive, but what happened later? Most ended up as "air coins" in name only. The key isn't the distribution ratio but the token's real liquidity and use cases.

The ZK (Zero-Knowledge) track has been hot over the past two years, and Brevis's positioning as a verifiable computing platform isn't unreasonable. But I've seen many similar foundational layer projects—technology prospects are one thing, ecological implementation is another. The five-day window from December 29 to January 3 for airdrop registration—how many people will actually complete the qualification verification? History shows that participation rates are often lower than expected.

What truly matters isn't whether you're on the airdrop list now, but what to do after claiming. To sell or to hold, at what price to release—this is the real test of an investor's insight. Those who have gone through several cycles understand that the essence of airdrops is project fundraising and marketing, not to be mythologized. Stay calm, participate rationally—that's the unchanging rule.