Recently, many people have been complaining about airdrop projects from a major exchange, and the comments are quite interesting—on one hand, they curse that even with a high score they can't grab the airdrops, on the other hand, they threaten to give up. It seems contradictory at first glance, but in fact, it reflects a common problem in the operation of such projects: the rules appear fair, but in practice, they become a battlefield of internal competition.

## Why is a score of 252 still instantly sniped?

This phenomenon sounds surreal, but the underlying logic is quite clear—it's the result of several forces acting together.

**First is the "arms race" among participants**

A score of 252 is indeed high, but the problem is—too many people have reached this score. Once the platform's rules are made public, everyone starts frantically piling up data: completing tasks, hoarding tokens, trading frequently. You work hard, others are working hard too, and ultimately, a high score becomes the basic requirement for entry rather than a competitive advantage. It's like the college entrance exam; the passing line rises every year, and the effort level keeps escalating in a cycle.

**Second is the "clamp war" from a technical perspective**

Those who haven't been "clamped" might not have truly participated. This isn't just psychological; it genuinely exists. Participants mainly fall into three categories:

One is professional scripts and bots. Their response times are in milliseconds, and they can complete a full set of operations—clicking, confirming, paying—immediately when the project opens. Ordinary people's reaction speed and network latency are simply not comparable.

Another is organized teams or communities. They pool funds and accounts, using unified tools or algorithms to snatch up tokens, then distribute the gains internally. Their success rate is far higher than individual retail traders because of scale effects and technical capabilities that are in a different league.

The third is unfairness caused by network latency itself. It may look like you and others clicked at the same time, but due to differences in ISP, DNS, server load, your request might arrive dozens of milliseconds later. In milliseconds-level competition, this makes all the difference.

## The market reality is like this

Honestly, there's no contradiction between failing to instantly snipe high scores and wanting to run away. The former indicates your effort isn't enough, while the latter shows you've recognized the reality.

In this "hell-level" micro battlefield, ordinary users find it very difficult to turn the tide through simple operational skills. The rules seem open, but at the execution level, there are invisible barriers—technology, capital, organizational ability, network conditions.

Some choose to keep participating, hoping for luck in the next round. Others choose to withdraw and focus their energy on other opportunities. Both choices are fine; the key is to understand the game rules clearly and not be fooled by superficial "fairness." This way, you can allocate resources and set expectations more rationally.