The progress of cryptocurrency regulation in Pakistan has sparked some reflections. Some officials privately admitted that the government has indeed been moving a bit too quickly in pushing forward crypto-related decisions. Where is the problem? One is that the economic foundation itself is relatively fragile, and rapid changes in crypto policies could bring unpredictable shocks; another more realistic concern is that government departments have not yet formed a unified understanding of how to handle crypto issues, and attitudes across departments vary significantly.



Such internal disagreements are actually quite common—after all, cryptocurrencies involve multiple dimensions such as finance, law, and technology, and it’s not easy to straighten things out in a short period. Moreover, for countries with less stable economic conditions, aggressive policy adjustments carry greater risks. Professionals in legal and tax fields are also paying attention to what impact these policy changes might bring.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 4h ago
The disagreement among departments... to put it simply, no one wants to take responsibility. The economy is already on shaky ground, and now dealing with crypto on top of that—this move is truly bold. No matter how this game is played, it's going to be difficult.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 6h ago
The fighting between departments is really unbelievable, still hoping to push things forward quickly
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580vip
· 6h ago
Data shows that the probability of policy swings spilling over onto the chain has historically been quite high... Let's wait and see how Pakistan's situation unfolds.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreetsvip
· 6h ago
Weak economic fundamentals and still playing quick decision-making? Isn't this a typical pattern of panic selling, just waiting to see how they cut losses later? Departments are not unified, and the repeated policies were predictable long ago. This kind of blood sacrifice is the easiest to miss out on. Pakistan's approach is basically shooting randomly, waiting to see who really gets hit. Regulatory policies change daily, and both project teams and retail investors have to follow the panic. This is the inevitable path before the formation of a value gap. The last frenzy before a sharp drop? Forget it, I'll wait for the bottom to speak.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Brovip
· 6h ago
Each department passing the buck to each other—that's the true reflection of the situation.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)