Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
#密码资产动态追踪 U.S. lawmakers have submitted over 130 amendments ahead of the crypto market regulation hearing. This reflects the differing positions and eventual compromises between the two parties on this hot-button issue.
Elizabeth Warren and the Democratic camp's concerns are very clear—investor protection comes first. They prioritize preventing financial risks, cracking down on insider trading, and stopping public officials from benefiting personally. In other words, they want to regulate the market with stricter standards.
On the other hand, Republicans represented by Cynthia Lummis and Tim Scott have a different approach. They want to create more space for innovation, with the key being to clarify legal boundaries. Protect developers who write code, delineate regulatory authority among different agencies, and prevent an industry from being stifled by multiple departments at once. $BTC $ETH Market participants have long had opinions on this.
Interestingly, although the two parties have different concerns, they both agree on one reality—the current regulation is too fragmented. The entire industry is dispersed across various agencies, leading to inefficiency and uncertainty. Establishing a nationwide unified framework has become a consensus. Even on amendments related to stablecoin yields, Democratic and Republican lawmakers have jointly submitted proposals, which is quite rare in politics.