Jake Claver to XRP Holders: Your Hardware Wallet Does Nothing When IRS Shows Up

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:320px;height:100px;} } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:728px;height:90px;} }

Crypto expert Jake Claver has issued a blunt warning to XRP holders and the wider digital asset community, emphasizing that hardware wallets offer no protection against legal enforcement actions.

In a recent post on X, Claver stated clearly that while hardware wallets are effective tools against cybercriminals, they provide no defense when confronted with a lawful court order.

“Your hardware wallet protects you from hackers. It does nothing against a court order,” Claver wrote. He added that when the Internal Revenue Service appears with legal authority, claiming that crypto assets were lost “in a boating accident” does not constitute a valid legal defense.

The message was targeted at individuals who believe that self-custody through hardware wallets places their holdings beyond the reach of government authorities. Claver’s post focused on clarifying the distinction between technological security and legal accountability.

Court Orders Override Self-Custody Protections

Claver’s statement underscores a central issue in digital asset ownership: self-custody prevents unauthorized third-party access, but it does not nullify legal obligations.

Hardware wallets are designed to secure private keys offline, reducing exposure to hacks and exchange failures. However, as Claver emphasized, compliance with tax laws and court directives remains mandatory regardless of where or how assets are stored.

His comments come amid ongoing discussions within the crypto community about tax liabilities, asset reporting, and enforcement mechanisms. By highlighting the limits of hardware wallet protection, Claver aimed to correct what he appears to view as a misconception among some investors.

The reference to the cited “boating accident” narrative reflects a long-running joke in crypto circles, where holders claim to have lost access to funds to avoid disclosure. Claver made it clear that such claims do not withstand legal scrutiny when examined under formal investigation.

Community Reactions Address Legal and Tax Risks

However, he warned that lying to federal officials constitutes a felony offense. He added that once funds are moved, discrepancies can be detected, potentially leading to charges of tax evasion or wire fraud, including financial penalties, interest, and possible imprisonment.

Claver’s original message, however, remained focused on legal compliance. His position was unambiguous: technological tools cannot shield individuals from statutory obligations. For XRP holders and other crypto investors, the post serves as a reminder that asset security and regulatory compliance are separate issues, and that failing to recognize this distinction may carry serious consequences.

Disclaimer*: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.*