On-chain interest vs. traditional interest, which is more attractive?



After stablecoin yields became a focus, the market suddenly realized that "passive income" can also be on the blockchain. The dialogue between banks and the White House is essentially a contest over interest rate influence.
Traditional banks profit from the interest rate spread, while if stablecoins directly distribute earnings to holders, it could weaken this model. Especially in a high-interest-rate environment, yield-generating stablecoins become more attractive.
However, stablecoins also have their own risks: transparency of issuers, safety of reserve assets, liquidity management, and more. If regulation is lacking, yields could turn into risk premiums.
From a policy perspective, the concern is more about macroeconomic impact. If a large amount of funds flow from banks to on-chain assets, could it affect the credit market? That’s why the dialogue continues.
Humorous summary: On-chain says "yield freedom," banks say "safety first," and the White House says "Stop arguing, I’m drafting the bill."#深度创作营
View Original
[The user has shared his/her trading data. Go to the App to view more.]
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Discoveryvip
· 10h ago
2026 GOGOGO 👊
Reply0
SpicyHandCoinsvip
· 11h ago
2026 Go Go Go 👊
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)