Hainan Airlines Holding and Li Mouyi Labor Dispute Case Haikou Maritime Court Ruling to End Enforcement

On March 30, 2026, according to data from Tianyancha, a judgment document recently published by China Judgments Online states that Hainan Airlines Holding Co., Ltd. was the applicant for enforcement. The case number is (2025) Qiong 72 Zhi 161, and the cause of action is a labor dispute. The court is the Haikou Maritime Court. The judgment date is March 17, 2026. Hainan Airlines Holding Co., Ltd. and the respondent Li Mouyi were both ruled to conclude the enforcement.

The following is a detailed report:

Court opinion: This court holds that during the enforcement proceedings in this case, this court has taken necessary enforcement measures and coercive measures, has exhausted property investigation measures, and has not found any property available for enforcement by the respondent. On March 16, 2026, this court contacted the applicant by phone to solicit their opinion. The applicant agreed to terminate this enforcement procedure for this case. In accordance with the relevant provisions of the “Supreme People’s Court Regulations on Strictly Regulating the Termination of the Current Enforcement Procedure (Trial),” this case should be terminated in this enforcement procedure. After this enforcement procedure is terminated, the applicant enjoys the right to request the respondent to continue performing its debts and, in accordance with law, to apply to the people’s court for resumption of enforcement. The respondent has an obligation to continue performing the debts to the applicant.

Case outcome: In accordance with Article 517 of the “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of Law,” the ruling is as follows: to terminate this enforcement procedure in this case. After this enforcement procedure is terminated, if the applicant finds that the respondent has property available for enforcement, the applicant may apply to this court for resumption of enforcement. An application for resumption of enforcement is not restricted by the statute of limitations for the application for enforcement. This ruling shall take effect immediately after service.

Judgment date: March 16, 2026

Related laws and regulations mentioned: Attached relevant legal provisions: Article 517 of the “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of Law” — after property investigation finds no property available for enforcement, a ruling to terminate the current enforcement procedure may be made after the applicant’s signature and confirmation, or after the execution court’s collegial panel reviews and verifies, and with the approval of the president. After execution is terminated pursuant to the preceding paragraph, if the applicant finds that the respondent has property available for enforcement, the applicant may apply for enforcement again. A reapplication is not restricted by the statute of limitations for the application for enforcement.

Statement: The market involves risks, and investment requires caution. This article is automatically published by an AI large model based on third-party databases, and does not represent the views of Sina Finance. Any information appearing in this article is for reference only and does not constitute personal investment advice. If there are any discrepancies, please refer to the actual announcements. If you have any questions, please contact biz@staff.sina.com.cn.

For a massive amount of information and precise interpretation, all on the Sina Finance APP

Byline: Xiao Lang Express