Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Hyperliquid founder once rejected a $1 billion valuation funding proposal, insisting on a "zero external investment" approach
Mars Finance reports that on April 13, Colossus reported that Hyperliquid founder Jeffrey Yan received an investment intention based on an estimated valuation of about $1 billion and a scale of approximately $100 million less than a year after the project launched.
But he ultimately chose to reject the investment terms after careful consideration.
The report shows that before and after proposing financing, the team was in a continuous “out-of-pocket” operational state, consuming the founder’s personal funds each month to cover project costs.
During investor outreach, Jeff communicated with multiple entrepreneurs and VCs about the nature and significance of capital injection but was never convinced that “external capital could enhance its intrinsic value.”
In the end, he clearly informed the team on Monday to reject the financing plan.
An internal source described that at that time, team members managing funds were shocked by this decision because many preparatory steps had already been taken around the financing.
Jeff’s core reason is that Hyperliquid is not a traditional company but an on-chain protocol that needs to maintain neutrality.
He believes that once external equity capital is introduced, it could undermine the protocol’s “permissionless and neutral” positioning, conflicting with its long-term design goals.
He has publicly stated that if Bitcoin had accepted VC funding in its early days, its “neutrality narrative” might have been weakened.
Under the same logic, he chose to continue maintaining Hyperliquid’s investor-free structure and support some operational expenses long-term with personal funds.
On January 28, 2024, he summarized the project’s principles on social media:
· No investors
· No paid market makers
· No fees charged to the development team (or the development team does not take fees)
· No insiders (or insider privileges)
This statement is also regarded as the core note of Hyperliquid’s “extreme decentralization/de-capitalization” approach.