Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I'm currently evaluating the project "Trustworthy or Not," mainly focusing on three aspects: GitHub, audit reports, and multi-signature upgrades. Don't just look at the stars on GitHub; the key is whether someone has been actively working recently, whether issues are being responded to, and whether the upgrade is just a last-minute patch. Also, don't be fooled by the words "audited" in the audit report; first check if there are high-risk issues that haven't been fixed, and whether the fixes are just verbal commitments or have corresponding commits. Multi-signature is even more practical—who are the signers, are they all just different accounts of the same group, is the threshold 2/3 or 1/1... Basically, who can change the code with one click if something goes wrong. Recently, everyone has been comparing RWA, US bond yields, and on-chain yield products together. I prioritize whether the rules can be secretly changed first; don’t let the seemingly attractive yields turn into a tax on your attention. I’ll filter my positions based on this to feel more at ease.