Are you asking what modular blockchains can do for regular users? I’ve been thinking about it too. Put simply, the day-to-day feel doesn’t seem that mysterious. In the past, it was one chain doing everything—if it got congested, it would get expensive and slow down. Now that things are separated, execution/data/settlement are handled by different parts, and in theory that just makes it less likely for you to get stuck when transferring or doing DeFi as a whole that turns into a slide deck. Fees can also be more stable by a small margin… but only if the frontend, the cross-chain bridge, and the wallet you’re using swallow that complexity for you. Otherwise, when users see a bunch of “initiated from A, settled at B, data at C,” they’ll only feel even more confused.

There’s also a practical issue: the more layers of modularization there are, the more security boundaries there are—and the more gaps. Lately, in the community, there’s been arguing about privacy coins, mixing, and compliance. But I actually feel like this will become part of “how upper-layer applications tell their story”: the underlying layer can potentially offer more privacy, but the entry point may be tightened. Anyway, I’m still sticking with my old habit—first check whether TVL/net inflow is keeping up with the hype, then decide whether to get involved. Going slow is not a big deal.