A Texas judge’s decision to overturn a state law that blacklisted financial firms for using environmental, social, or governance (ESG) factors in investment decisions, including BlackRock, is expected to pave the way for challenges against similar anti-ESG laws in other U.S. states. Analysts believe this ruling, which cited First Amendment free-speech protections, provides a “roadmap” for repealing policies targeting ESG activities across the country. The decision reinforces the idea that managing climate-related risks is consistent with investors’ fiduciary duties, despite legislative attempts to politically punish such considerations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Analysis-Rejection of Texas law blacklisting ‘woke’ BlackRock could challenge anti-ESG laws in other states
A Texas judge’s decision to overturn a state law that blacklisted financial firms for using environmental, social, or governance (ESG) factors in investment decisions, including BlackRock, is expected to pave the way for challenges against similar anti-ESG laws in other U.S. states. Analysts believe this ruling, which cited First Amendment free-speech protections, provides a “roadmap” for repealing policies targeting ESG activities across the country. The decision reinforces the idea that managing climate-related risks is consistent with investors’ fiduciary duties, despite legislative attempts to politically punish such considerations.