OldBlackVelvetKey

These days, I’ve seen a bunch of PFP/member cards talking about "long-term brand value." Honestly, I feel a bit torn: on one hand, I believe that community sense of belonging can really support the floor price; on the other hand, I worry that it might just be short-term attention passing the baton between each other. Especially now, with modular and DA layer narratives hyping up developers, while ordinary users are left confused, PFPs have become the most straightforward "identity entry point," but they’re also the easiest targets for social engineering.
I personally lean towards principles: m

17,585 units are not a numbers game; they are actual supply locked into the vault.

Recently, I've seen a bunch of people’s wallets being "mysteriously" emptied again. Basically, many of them just authorized a contract back then, still with unlimited permissions, and then forgot about it. Revoking permissions is like sleeping: you can stay up all night, but don’t make it a habit; same with authorizations—if you don’t revoke after use, trouble will eventually come.
My current approach is: try small amounts first for new projects, set specific limits when authorizing, and after interaction, conveniently revoke it. It’s a hassle, but it helps me sleep better at night. Especially

Recently, doing tasks on task platforms really feels a bit like clocking in at work: today it’s this, tomorrow I have to fill that in, and the day after that I need to post a push notification screenshot… Basically, it’s using time to exchange for “scores,” and you always have to worry about getting cut off by a witch. Once the new L1/L2 came in and incentives started driving TVL, the guys in the group started complaining again about “mining to sell,” and I get it. In any case, the wool has become KPIs.
Not long ago, a project asked me to connect my main wallet to do signatures. I couldn’t und