I've done various odd jobs in DAOs, so I understand process friction better than most. I enjoy discussing governance proposals, incentive distortions, and human nature, and sometimes I can be a bit sarcastic.

DaoPeripheralWorker

3h ago

Once yield-focused ETFs are launched, various strategy portfolios and risk control models will incorporate BTC into the regular asset basket.

BTC0.02%

View Original

Furan869992026-04-16 11:05:29

In the past, Wall Street looked at Bitcoin as if it were a “rogue-style” asset—criticizing it out loud, while keeping a close watch on it with their hands. Now, no more pretending—within a month, four major firms have almost simultaneously moved: Morgan Stanley rolled out a spot BTC ETF (MSBT, fee 0.14%), Goldman Sachs filed an application for a Bitcoin Premium Income ETF with the SEC, BlackRock has reapplied for a Bitcoin yield-related ETF (BITA), and Citigroup has stepped in more deeply in the capacity of an authorized participating institution (AP). Meanwhile, the total size of US Bitcoin spot ETFs has surged to $96.5 billion, and BlackRock’s IBIT alone has taken $55 billion, accounting for about 57% of the entire market; on the same day, Goldman Sachs–related actions also saw a net inflow of $411 million.
This batch of signals is actually very straightforward: Wall Street isn’t here to “buy coins by following the trend.” They’re here to standardize Bitcoin, productize it, and bring it into compliance. You can understand it as an “asset identity upgrade”—from what used to be a “non-mainstream asset,” it is being rewrapped as a standard financial product that can be bought, allocated, and used to enhance yield within institutional accounts. For institutions, the significance of ETFs is not about whether prices go up or down, but about a compliant channel + a risk-control framework + a continuous pool of funds: being able to enter the investment-advisory system, fit into a pension logic, and make strategy allocations is the most critical incremental value.#GatePreIPOs首发SpaceX #加密市场回升

Reward
like
Comment
Repost
Share

DaoPeripheralWorker

6h ago

Recently, the group has been discussing stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and rumors like "it's about to de-anchor, run fast."
Honestly, what everyone is panicking about isn't the terminology; it's that they don't know who ultimately has the final say.
I'll focus on one main thread: you think that on-chain "finality" is a given, but in reality, it's all about people and processes.
Data availability is whether you can get the ledger contents; if you can't, you can only trust someone else's screenshot.
Ordering is about who goes first and who goes later—don't underestimate this, as

View Original

1 Likes

Reward
1
Comment
Repost
Share

DaoPeripheralWorker

23h ago

MSBT 0.14% fee rate is too competitive, with over 30 million in net inflow on the first day; afterward, it depends on whether "cheaper + backing from major institutions" can continue to attract funds.

View Original

BraveBullsAreNotAfra2026-04-14 09:43:29

Morgan Stanley's first spot Bitcoin ETF has opened trading on NYSE Arca, with the ticker MSBT, marking a direct stress test on its first day: can a bank-backed fund attract capital inflows solely because it is cheaper in a volatile market? Industry data shows that approximately 1.6 million shares were traded on the first day, and depending on the underlying assets tracked, the net inflow was about **$30–$34 million**. The fund's fee rate is 0.14%, making it the lowest-cost spot Bitcoin ETF in the U.S. market. Over the next two days, the newly launched MSBT ETF attracted an additional capital inflow of over $31 million.